University dining in Florida lives at the intersection of two regulators. Contract foodservice operators (Aramark, Sodexo, Chartwells, Compass) are typically permitted under DBPR Division of Hotels and Restaurants Chapter 61C-4. In-house university food authorities or K-12 partner cafeterias on campus may fall under FDACS Chapter 5K-4. The technical standard is the same FDA Food Code; the records and inspection paths are different.
Florida regulates public food service establishments under DBPR if they're commercial restaurants. School food service for K-12 falls under FDACS. Universities are tertiary education and most contract their dining to commercial operators, which puts the operator under DBPR.
The same building can have both: a university contract dining hall (DBPR) and a campus-housed charter K-12 cafeteria (FDACS).
DBPR Chapter 61C-4 covers public food service establishments. The food-safety reference is FDA Food Code 2017 with 2022 supplement, same as FDACS adopted.
DBPR inspections at university dining halls run on a routine cadence with priority/priority-foundation/core finding categories. Cold-holding above 41 F is a priority finding.
FDACS 5K-4.020 permits public-school food service. K-12 cafeterias on a university campus (uncommon but exists) follow this path. In-house university operations that don't contract out may also fall here in some cases; verify with the regulator.
Tampa Bay university dining rarely uses 5K-4 because the contract operator brings their own DBPR permit.
DBPR and FDACS both reference the FDA Food Code. The cold-holding rule, the cooling rule, the reheat rule are identical: 41 F, 135-70-41 F in 2-then-4 hours, 165 F.
Inspection forms differ. DBPR uses a digital report system; FDACS uses its own. Records-management software for a university with mixed permits should produce both.
University contract operators sometimes default to their corporate-standard records template, which may not include all FDACS data points if they hold any 5K-4 sites. Check the satellite locations.
Refrigeration service records, EPA 608 Section 82.166 refrigerant tracking, and asset registries should be unified across the campus regardless of inspection regulator.
For DBPR-permitted dining halls, FrostIQ pulls DBPR food-establishment inspection data and helps a director of dining trend findings across the contract operator's portfolio.
ColdSentry continuous monitoring and ArcticOS records work for both DBPR and FDACS sites; the cold-chain data is the same data, only the regulator is different.
USF Dining, University of Tampa Dining, St. Petersburg College foodservice, and HCC dining are run by contract operators on DBPR permits. K-12 partner programs on those campuses (rare, but exist for charter or magnet contracts) may carry FDACS permits.
Director of facilities at a university typically owns the refrigeration service contract while the dining operator owns the food-safety records.
University dining halls operated under contract by Aramark, Sodexo, Chartwells, or Compass are typically DBPR Chapter 61C-4 permitted because the operator is a commercial restaurant.
Yes — DBPR-permitted university dining inspection data flows through the same DBPR system that FrostIQ reads.
The FDA Food Code reference and the technical standards: 41 F cold holding, the cooling rule, the reheat rule, calibrated probes, employee health policy.
Yes, though it's uncommon. A university contract dining hall (DBPR) plus an on-campus K-12 charter cafeteria (FDACS) is a real configuration.
Suncoast Cold Systems handles exactly this kind of commercial refrigeration issue across Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Brandon, Riverview, Temple Terrace, and Wesley Chapel. 24/7 dispatch. Licensed Class A A/C Contractor (FL #CAC1824642), EPA 608 Universal, OSHA 30 Construction.
How FAC 5K-4 applies to Florida K-12 cafeterias.
What 7 CFR 210 expects from K-12 refrigeration records.
Which refrigeration findings trigger emergency orders vs citations.